PIA has announced it was "proven in US court" but it was not proven in US court and could not have been because there was never any evidence shown the court that PIA does not store logs and the case was not about PIA so its impossible for it to have been proven in court as there is no court decision/verdict substantiating that PIA has proven they do not store logs. It seems semantics to some over there, but "jbis" has suitably pointed out that saying something and proving something are two different things. Then see that PIA closed the thread without ever suitably responding to the request they submit the proof they claim was "proven in US court".īy closing the thread and not suitably responding it sure makes them look like they did lie in their announcement and that user 'jbis' was right. Every time someone brought up something that was not correct or seemed to not be true about logging and pointed it out the PureVPN fan boys would jump in to try to discredit them and shout them down and PureVPN support would try to discredit them and explain it away and defend it just like support has done here." If there was no evidence proof that "Private Internet Access does not store any type of logs and never will." which was provided in US court and the case was not about PIA then its impossible for it to have been "proven in US court" - where he pretty much says what will happen next with a VPN trying to suppress people bringing forth lies and inconsistencies in statements from a VPN - see where jbis says I could have lived with that and not said a word about it, but "proven in US court" is a lie. > "as presented in US court" > would have been truthful, accurate, conveyed the same message, and matched the "sentiment" Max-P and PIAJayson conveyed. Thank you for helping us fight the good fight." Had it read > "In light of recent news, we would like our clients to rest assured that, as presented in US court, Private Internet Access does not store any type of logs and never will. "The announcement statement as written now is a lie. Of interest is the bottom of the post from the user 'jbis' at > where he states:
The announcement being referred to in the thread is >
There is an interesting thread over at PIA >
0 kommentar(er)
